Real sword M4A1 GBBR is king!!!
 

Quoted from a Chinese forum(combat2000), shows how real sword company make their M4A1 GBBR, millitary grade product line.lol, guess it beats all the WA system GBBR on the market, the only thing I am kinda concern is the marking, Norinco marking is fine with me, colt marking even better, hopefully not just leave it blank or put the RS logo on it.

forged and CNC, millitary grade material, use real steel producing procedure, its not just a toy...

http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...5d5d20424d.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...e298a29780.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...b3c9421237.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...c444677e83.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...cf5948cde4.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...b57950f042.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...891a4d2420.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...c752a4076e.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...3c4b95bb44.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...1813399942.jpg
http://www.combat2008.com.cn/attachm...2be10e0cb4.jpg

Wish thats a G36 rather then a M4 but whatever it's still sexy

guessing like $3k in country lol popularity and newness factors are a bitch

Ino played that game of forging receiver and what not.....in GBBR there are always a ton of hype....nothing will be known for sure until guns are in player's hand...

I guess you are right on that, The difference I see is they use different grade of metal/material, Real sword metal are for real steel though, while ino's are for toy.

I usually live by the motto,

Don't count your chickens until they hatch.


I believe this applies. Call me cautiously optimistic.

If the M4 are anything like there other guns it'll be worth it's weight in gold but your right we'll have to see/test the preference first and that won't happen till i get my hands on it(or whatever lucky bastard in Canada gets the first one)

Agreed, If their build quality approaches the level of their AEG line that will be awesome. What worries me is the chatter in regards to the internals, there has been mixed messages and some are concerned that they are trying to reinvent the wheel with their rifle. Which can swing either way.

either they learned from their predecessors mistakes, or they didn't. Only time (and a very large bankroll I suspect) will tell.

Do you have a link to the chatter about the internals?, I'd like to have a look.

Its mainly speculation from attendies at shot show. Due to the fact that the internals where not unveiled (justifiably so I imagine)

http://www.gasguns.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=2743

Somewhere in this mess. Like I said, its up in the air. No confirmation as to if its clone internals or their own bag. Which is why it can swing either way.. Either they built upon the success's of WE/WA/ect or they went their own way.

Only time will tell.

Took a look at your link Rugger_can and there's nothing definitive just speculation though i gotta say i hope RS goes with their own GBB system instead of cloning the WA or WE GBBs, whatever i guess i'll find out in a year or so(One can hope...)

I agree that everyting is still in the air at the moment, but if RS got their own GBB system that means different internal and different mags, I am not worry about the internal parts as RS always got the quality parts, but when we talking about mags, thats the other story. we all know that GBBR mags aint cheap... I personally perfer they use the WA system and from all the info I 've got so far, the chance RS using the WA system is high. comparing with the WE system, WA system is way more realistic.

+1 for RS stuff ... I still like the inokatsu, both 7075 anyways :)

Pretty sure ino had forged 7075 aluminum receiver, which was the whole selling point of their line. Which IS the material of actual M4 receiver. RS has the support I guess with Norinco to make theirs(maybe), but forging is not exactly rocket science...Most of the work in GBBR anyway goes into gas system and tuning and Ino got it pretty wrong when they deviated from the WA sizing on their resized bolt, and its not until the 2009/2010 version when they reverted to the WA sizes that they got their gun working.

Pretty much for all the OEMs their claim cannot be taken on face value until you actually see it....

The above images are from the RS 2010 catalog. It's available online in its complete form.

RS has been very tight lipped about the GBBRs. However, enough has been said that I think there is next to no chance that we'll see them adopt the WE system. WA is the most likely.

Unless RS price them ridiculously (I really hope they don't), I don't see them being $3,000 in Canada through RS' official Canadian distributor. Of course, I can't speak for anyone who'd bring it a couple and milk the hype.

If I were to be worried about anything, I'd be worried about RS doing too good of a job and making a lower receiver that's too close to the real thing to be acceptable. So, fingers crossed.